When the Brain Is Hijacked - Where Does Choice Sit?

Pressure, the Hijacked Brain, and the Question of Authority

When The Brain Is Hijacked - Introduction

When the brain is hijacked, people are often told they have “lost control.” That language is understandable - and misleading.

In reality, many people caught in reactive, compulsive, or self-sabotaging patterns understand exactly what is happening:

• They recognise the patterns. 
• They see the consequences. 
• Some can even explain the psychology or neuroscience involved. 

Insight is rarely the missing ingredient.

What changes under pressure is how decision-making is organised.

When stress, urgency, threat, or emotional overload rises, the brain shifts priorities.

Systems designed for speed, habit, and relief dominate, while the capacity to pause, reflect, and choose deliberately becomes under-active.

Dopamine-driven wanting intensifies, habit circuitry takes over, and stress responses amplify urgency - a pattern consistently observed in neuroscience research on automatic and compulsive behaviour. 

This is what people are describing when they say:  “...it felt automatic”,  “I knew better but still did it”, or “I wasn’t really choosing.”

When the brain is hijacked, urges do not simply arise:

• They arrive with force.
• Thoughts justify action.
• Behaviour unfolds quickly.

This is not a moral failure. It is not a lack of intelligence, motivation, or care. And it is not solved by “trying harder”.

If behaviour under pressure is understood this way, the central question shifts. The question is no longer “Why do I keep doing this?” or even “How do I stop?” The more precise question becomes:

When pressure hits, who is actually deciding?

Behaviour Under Pressure: A Shift in Power, Not a Lack of Insight

When the brain is hijacked, behaviour does not stop being organised. It is reorganised.

Decisions are still being made - but they are increasingly driven by systems optimised for immediacy rather than reflection.

Habit and threat-response systems dominate while executive oversight weakens, particularly under emotional load.

Over time, behaviour becomes less responsive to intention and more responsive to urgency, relief, and repetition.

This shows up across everyday life:

• Snapping in anger despite intending to stay calm
• Compulsive phone checking even while wanting to focus
• Stress-driven avoidance or over-consumption
• Repeating the same relational reactions despite insight

A familiar sequence unfolds:

1. Pressure rises.
2. The body tightens.
3. A thought appears: “I just need relief.”
4. The impulse does not feel like a suggestion - it feels like an instruction.

By the time reflection catches up, the behaviour has already happened.

This is not because someone “chose badly”, it is because authority silently shifted.

Authority: What Actually Decides When the Brain Is Hijacked

When the brain is hijacked, it can feel as though choice disappears entirely. Subjectively, that experience is real. And yet, something subtle is still happening beneath the surface.

Behaviour is still governed by authority:

• Not reflective authority.
• Not values-based authority.
• But automatic authority - granted to urgency, habit, and relief.

Zen Tools refers to this dynamic as "Mental Authority".

Mental authority refers to where decision-making power sits - whether actions are chosen deliberately, or automatically dictated by urgent thoughts under pressure.

It refers to where decision-making authority is located when thoughts, sensations, and impulses arise.

Under pressure, authority is often granted - instantly and invisibly - to whatever is loudest:

• The urge promising relief
• The thought rationalising action
• The bodily pressure demanding discharge

"Authority Above Thought" introduces a different relationship.

Thoughts, urges, and sensations are recognised as events, not commands.

But recognition alone is not enough.

Research on metacognitive awareness shows that recognising thoughts and urges as mental events - rather than instructions - reduces automatic behavioural follow-through and increases regulatory capacity over time. 

Authority does not move by insight. It moves by interruption.

How Authority Is Shifted in Practice

Authority shifts when the automatic handover of decision-making is deliberately slowed.

Under pressure, authority is transferred by speed. Urgency appears, thought narrates, behaviour follows — all before conscious choice has a chance to enter.

The practical act is precise and repeatable.

When pressure, urge, or impulse arises, the first move is not to decide differently. It is to pause long enough to make authority explicit.

This can be done internally with a single orienting statement:

“This is a thought or urge — not a decision.”

• This is not positive thinking.
• It is not self-persuasion.
• It is not an attempt to stop the impulse.
• It is a jurisdictional clarification.

In that moment, three things are separated:

• Experience - what is arising.
• Narrative - what the mind is saying about it.
• Authority - what is allowed to decide.

Nothing else is required yet. The urge may remain intense. The thought may continue. Behaviour may still follow.

But the automatic assumption - “this must be obeyed” - has been interrupted.

Reflective choice becomes possible after authority has been relocated from urgency’s automatic “go” signal to the level where values, context, and consequences can be consulted.

Zen Tools refers to this reflective choice of authority as "Authority Above Thought"

Reflective choice does not mean forcing a better outcome. It means allowing a non-automatic decision to occur.

____________

Authority Above Thought - Locking In the Gains

Zen Tools uses a simple, repeatable micro-protocol called Authority Above Thought - Locking In the Gains .

It is not a mindset and not a technique for control. Its sole function is to prevent urgency from automatically becoming the decision-maker.

The protocol has one job: to relocate decision-making authority above thought, urge, and sensation - so these can be present without being granted the right to decide.

[1]  Name the event (not the story)

• “Pressure is present.”
• “An urge is present.”
• “A justification is forming.”

[2] Make jurisdiction explicit

• “This is an urge — not a decision” or
• “This is a thought — not an instruction.”

[3] Place authority deliberately

• “Decision authority sits with me — above this pressure.”

[4] Choose the smallest non-automatic next action

• Delay
• Change environment
• Reduce exposure, or 
• Consult values and context.

Repeated over time, this trains the nervous system that urgency can be felt without being obeyed. This is what relocating authority means in real time.

____________

What This Approach Can, and Can't, Do

Authority Above Thought does not:

• Eliminate stress or strong emotion
• Prevent urges from arising
• Override biology
• Guarantee behaviour change
• Replace therapy, coaching, or environmental change

When the brain is hijacked, external support often matters most:

• Reducing pressure and overload
• Changing environments
• Increasing safety and containment
• Receiving relational or professional support

Where this approach fits is alongside those supports.

It addresses one internal dynamic: the automatic transfer of decision-making authority to urgency under pressure.

By interrupting that transfer, it prevents every impulse from becoming an instruction.

This work is not about handling life alone. It is about changing the internal conditions under which clarity becomes possible.

Closing Reflections & Gentle Points of Orientation

Points for Reflection

• When pressure rises, what usually takes authority - urgency, habit, or awareness?
• How do thoughts speak under stress: as commentary, justification, or command?
• Can you notice the exact moment when impulse begins to decide?
• What changes when you name an urge as not yet a decision?
• How does speed affect authority in your own patterns?

Points for Gentle Action

• Practise the single pause: “This is an urge - not a decision.”
• Notice moments where reaction is delayed, even briefly.
• Treat reactive behaviour as information about system load, not personal failure.
• Pair internal authority with external support rather than replacing it.
• When choice feels unavailable, prioritise safety and reduction of pressure.

The aim is not mastery. It is not purity. It is not control.

Our objective here is the gradual relocation of authority - away from whatever is loudest, and toward a level of awareness that does not need to fight the brain in order to respond more wisely.

Recommended Further Reading To Support Your Practice

• Why Insight Alone Does Not Change Behaviour - Locking In The Gains
• Living in Survival Mode Without Surrendering Mental Authority
• The Mechanics Of Inner Conflict-Not Confusing Signals As Instructions
• The Wise Advocate - Helping You Achieve The Very Best Outcome

Return from: "Why Insight Alone Does Not Change Behaviour"  to: Home Page or  Inner Mastery For Outer Impact

Next Article: Living in Survival Mode Without Surrendering Mental Authority

Contact me