Regression to the mean shows that following an extreme random event, the next random event is likely to be less extreme.
The concept was first presented by Sir Francis Galton and the more comprehensive statement of regression to the mean is that:
In any series of events with complex phenomena that are dependent on many variables, and where chance is involved, extreme outcomes tend to be followed by more moderate ones.
It is not a mathematical law but a statistical tendency.
To be able to understand regression to the mean, we first need to understand correlation.
Correlation is a relationship, thus action A relates to outcome B.
The strength or weakness of the correlation of shared factors [or causes] will show the level of dependency of the outcome [or score] on those factors.
If the correlation is strong there will be little to no regression to the mean, whereas as a weak or non-existent correlation between shared factors will likely show that there is a regression.
Examples:
[1] Strong correlation of factors - TEMPERATURE
The only factor determining temperature – velocity of molecules — is shared by all scales, hence each degree in Celsius will have exactly one corresponding value in Fahrenheit.
So the temperature in Celsius and Fahrenheit will have a correlation coefficient of 1 and a plotting of temperature score will be a straight line.
[2] Weak to non-existent correlation of factors - BOTTLED WATER CONSUMPTION and DEATHS FROM AIR CRASHES
If we looked at all
countries in the world and plotted death rates from air crashes per country, in any specific year ,
against per capita consumption of bottled water, the plotting of scores for each event would show no
pattern at all. Thus the correlation coefficient is 0, i.e. there is no correlation.
We need to be especially careful of regression to the mean when we are trying to establish causality between two factors. As we have already established: Correlation is a relationship, thus action A relates to outcome B. Whereas: # Causation can be defined as action A causes outcome B. # Causation results from a perfect correlation between action A and outcome B.
This is something that many people, social media, the general media, and
sometimes even trained scientists, fail to understand or recognise.
Regression To The Mean - The Dangers Of False Attribution Of Cause & Effect
Regression To The Mean - Examples
Can you recall a wonderful evening out? The weather was fabulous, your table was great and restaurant was excellent, the food and wine were superb and you were with great people.
Then you tried to repeat the experience and somehow it wasn't as good and you were disappointed. Why was this? It was because your perfect evening was due to a random series of chance events that all fell in place on the wonderful evening.
Whenever you try to repeat the perfect experience, chances are that at least one thing won't be perfect the next time.
Regression to the mean is prevalent in sport and can explain the “manager of the month curse” in football.
This award is usually won by managers who have had four or more wins in a row, often because of a combination of skill and luck.
When the luck runs out, the “curse” strikes.
Regression to the mean can be harmless, but it becomes a problem when it is misinterpreted:
"For example, imagine you ran a hospital and were told that hospital-acquired infections were five times higher than average last month. A colleague tells you they know the cause and it can solved by using more prophylactic antibiotics.
You agree and in the following month you’re told that prophylactic antibiotic use is through the roof and infections have come down. Your mind makes a causal connection and you’re now convinced of the need for widespread prophylactic antibiotics, a potentially dangerous connection given that the unusual infection rate could have been due to chance events.
Now your hospital budget will be tighter because of the costs of using more antibiotics, and you’re contributing to serious problem of antibiotic resistance."
Here are 4 suggestions for identifying and countering false attribution of cause and effect and understanding the regression to the mean
Return to: Mental Models
- What if everything we think…
LATEST ARTICLES
The Power Of Patience - Why You Need The World's Toughest Quality
Demonizing The Other and Personal Acts Of Compassion
Why You Should Embrace Anomalies - The Incredible Value Of Disconfirming Evidence
Amazing Grace - The Majesty And The Mercy of Freedom From Your Pain
The Transformative Power Of Acceptance
Inversion - The Power Of Opposite Thinking
Are You Aligned With Reality? Or Do You See What You Believe?
The Law Of Response and Outcome
Clear Thinking - Turning Ordinary Moments Into Extraordinary Results
Self Dialogue - Working With Your Many Selves
The Balanced Brain - The Ultimate Route To Personal Transformation
How To Make Better Decisions - By Avoiding The Narrative Trap
The Greatest Love - The Most Important Relationship You Will Ever Have
Everything Is Connected And Why You Don't Feel It
Who Is In Charge Of Your Brain?
How To Be A Winner On A Very Large Scale
The Metagame Approach To Life
- Being better by doing things d…Shantideva - The Way Of The Bodhisattva
Reframing History - Deconstruction And Discussion Not Destruction
Tao Te Ching - Connecting To Your True Source Of Power.
How Things Really Are - The Inbuilt Design Flaws
Intuition Or Anxiety - Are There Angels Or Devils Crawling Here?
What Is Truth - How To Tell A Partial Truth From The Whole Truth?
Duality And Life Beyond Your Thinking Mind
The Conscious Mind Is Limited - Be Aware And Be Prepared
Your Inner Map Of Reality - Here's Why You Think The Way You Do
The Failure Of Cancel Culture - Suppression Not Engagement
4 Big Reasons Why We Get Stuck In Our Attempts At Personal Change
How Do I Change And Why Is It So Hard?
The Illusion Of A Separate Self - Windows 11 With Self Awareness!